In the blockchain industry, security is paramount, and with quantum computing on the horizon, ensuring the safety of users’ funds becomes even more important. Quantum computers, with their immense processing power, according to Vitalik Buterin pose a significant threat to the cryptographic algorithms that underpin blockchain networks like Ethereum.
Vitalk in a recent article gave a hypothetical scenario where bad actors gain access to quantum computers and exploit their capabilities to steal funds, and it becomes imperative to devise immediate strategies to mitigate such risks.
Quantum computers could potentially break traditional encryption methods that depend on solving complex math problems like factorization and discrete logarithms. They pose a risk to elliptic curve cryptography, commonly used in blockchain networks to create public-private key pairs. Quantum computers can efficiently calculate the discrete logarithm of elliptic curve points, threatening the security of private keys.
Vitalik suggests countering this quantum threat by adopting quantum-resistant cryptography. Techniques like Winternitz signatures and STARKs provide defense against quantum attacks by using cryptographic tools considered secure even against quantum threats. However, Vitalik notes that implementing these techniques requires significant time and effort, which may not be feasible on short notice during a sudden quantum shift.
In other news, Vitalik Buterin argues Artificial Intelligence could surpass humans as the apex species on the planet. What do you think of this?
Despite the challenges of quantum computing, Vitalik proposes a practical solution to protect users’ funds in a quantum emergency: a recovery hard fork. Unlike a regular hard fork for protocol upgrades, a recovery hard fork is specifically designed to address security risks and safeguard user assets.
Vitalik noted that in the event of a quantum attack, a recovery hard fork to mitigate the threats. The process would involve identifying the Quantum Transition, which entails detecting any instances where quantum computers are used to compromise network security. Signs of this could include unusual transaction signatures or sudden fund transfers that suggest unauthorized access.
In response to a detected quantum threat, a hard fork would be initiated to return to a Safe State. This rollback would undo all blocks created after the point where significant theft or unauthorized transactions occurred, effectively restoring the network to a secure state before the quantum attack.
As an additional precaution, traditional externally owned account (EOA)-based transactions could be temporarily disabled to prevent further exploitation of quantum vulnerabilities. This measure aims to safeguard funds while the network undergoes the recovery process.
In the newly hard-forked chain, new transaction types compatible with quantum-resistant cryptography will be introduced. These transaction types will allow users to securely transact using quantum-resistant signature schemes, safeguarding their funds from potential quantum attacks.
To improve transaction integrity and authenticity, incorporating STARK proofs into the blockchain protocol could be a valuable mechanism. These proofs would validate private preimages and their associated hash functions, ensuring secure transaction validation in a post-quantum environment. Due to the computational complexity of STARK proofs, optimizing gas efficiency becomes crucial. Implementing batch proofs for multiple transactions can decrease resource consumption while upholding robust security measures against quantum threats.
